玛雅彩票软件 - 玛雅彩票注册

来源：玛雅彩票注册网2024-01-09 17:48

玛雅彩票软件

加拿大华侨华人兔年新春活动陆续登场******

　　中新社多伦多1月6日电 (记者余瑞冬)农历癸卯年新春临近，加拿大各地华侨华人的一系列迎新春活动正陆续登场。

　　各地华人同乡会、文艺团体等已从去年底开始举办各类迎新春活动。年节气氛已渐入高潮。

　　在加拿大最大城市多伦多，以中国音乐指挥家李德伦之名命名的李德伦音乐基金会定于1月7日举办“中西汇粹”新年音乐会，从而拉开多伦多“欢乐春节”系列活动的序幕。此次演出将由中国青年女指挥家崔琳涵执棒。这也是始于2002年的该贺岁音乐会因新冠疫情中断两年后首度恢复演出。

　　紧接其后，加拿大中文媒体记者协会等主办的“中国故事中国年”加拿大华侨华人春晚将于8日上演。多伦多众多华人文艺团体将奉献歌舞、器乐、戏曲曲艺、武术等节目。多伦多华人艺术家中心14日将举办中西合璧的“歌扬乐舞迎新春”音乐会。大年初一，加拿大皇家天使交响乐团将为多伦多乐迷们奉献世界名曲新春交响音乐会；加中体育文化交流中心等机构则将在冰场举行一场别具特色的“迎新春冰上嘉年华”。

　　多伦多中区唐人街在除夕及大年初一将举行系列节庆活动，民众可欣赏传统舞狮、民间舞蹈，也可体验书法、麻将，品尝中式美食等。

　　在加拿大西海岸的温哥华，加拿大华人联合总会第21届春晚也将在7日晚亮相。由当地舞蹈教学机构与爱好舞蹈的义工团体联袂举办的“春之舞”晚会，以及“加中亲善大使”大山主持、青少年音乐艺术爱好者们担纲主角的“春之声·欢乐颂”新年慈善音乐会将先后于14日、15日举行。

　　加拿大华人社团联席会将于除夕日在大温哥华地区一处大型购物中心举办首届中国春节文化庙会，届时将呈现多彩的“中国风”文艺节目，并进行丰富的中国传统文化展示。大年初一，温哥华中华会馆等众多侨团机构及其他族裔团体将在唐人街恢复举办中断两年的春节庆会。其中的主打活动——华埠春节大巡游已是温哥华颇具代表性的多元文化节庆活动之一。

　　在蒙特利尔，多家侨社团体和机构共同举办的、以“友谊地久天长”为主题的第七届枫花雪乐中国春节晚会将于1月10日上演。艺术家们将带来中西交融的各类节目。蒙特利尔华人联合总会将在14日举办“温暖迎春”侨学界春节联欢晚会暨优秀学生奖学金颁发典礼。唐人街也将在大年初一迎来新春游行。

　　在卡尔加里，农历小年和春节的两个周末，卡城中华文化中心都将举行新春嘉年华活动。

　　此外，加拿大多所高校的中国留学生们也将举办多场洋溢青春气息的春晚。

　　进入兔年正月后，新春节目仍将不断。加拿大中国戏曲艺术协会主办的“玉兔迎春梨园情”海外新年戏曲晚会将于1月29日在多伦多粉墨登场。由加拿大多地华星艺术团等团体主办的“四海同春·华星闪耀”2023加拿大春晚将自1月28日至2月中旬先后在温尼伯、多伦多、渥太华、温哥华和蒙特利尔五大城市上演，为各地民众奉献中西交融的歌舞、器乐、杂技等精彩节目。(完)

中新网评：处理核污水绝不是日本自家私事******

　　中新网北京1月19日电(蒋鲤)日本政府近日称，将于2023年春夏期间开始向海洋排放经过处理的福岛第一核电站核污水。日本罔顾国内民众及周边国家的屡屡反对，企图将核污水“一倒了之”，把一件关乎全球海洋生态环境和公众健康的事当成了自家私事。

资料图：日本福岛第一核电站。

　　2011年，福岛核电站事故发生后，大量放射性物质泄漏到大气层和太平洋，对周围环境造成了难以逆转的伤害，数十万人被迫撤离该地区。时至今日，作为日本邻国之一的韩国仍未解除福岛海鲜禁令。

　　日本以核污水存储能力即将达到上限为由，在2021年4月13日，正式决定将福岛第一核电站核污水排入太平洋。过去一年多，日本政府和东京电力公司一直在持续推进核污水排海计划。

　　日本政府辩称，这些核污水经多核素处理系统(ALPS)处理后很安全，甚至“可以喝”，这样的表态无疑在愚弄大众。

　　事实上，经过处理的核污水仍含有多种放射性物质，核污水一旦排放入海就无法回收，长期来看，将会给海洋生态带来难以估量的潜在威胁，最终危害人类健康。

　　因此，核污水排海计划推出后，遭到日本民众强烈反对。日本《朝日新闻》2022年3月公布的问卷调查显示，福岛县、宫城县和岩手县受访的42个市町村长中，约六成反对东京电力公司福岛第一核电站核污水排放入海。日本全国渔业协会联合会也多次申明立场，反对该计划。

　　日本政府认为，核污水排海是最便宜、最省事的解决方案，但此举却将周边国家乃至全世界置于核污染风险中。太平洋非日本一家之海，核污水会随着洋流流动，其影响势必会跨越国界，危害周边国家乃至整个国际社会的公共福祉和利益。

　　《韩国经济新闻》发文称，相关研究认为，福岛核污水如果排放入海，约7个月后将到达济州等韩国海域，该国水产业和旅游业将遭受相当大的损失。

　　德国南极海洋机构也曾发出警告，若日本将所有核污水排入海中，不到半年，整个太平洋都将面临高度辐射威胁，包括远在大洋另一端的美国。太平洋地区人民更是对日本该计划持反对意见。

　　日本作为《联合国海洋法公约》缔约国，有义务保护海洋环境。然而，在核污水排海方案的正当性、核污水数据的可靠性、净化装置的有效性、环境影响的不确定性等问题上，日本未能作出科学、可信的说明。

　　国际原子能机构技术工作组虽已三次赴日实地考察评估，但尚未就日排海方案的安全性给出结论，并且对日本提出诸多澄清要求和整改意见。在此情况下，日本仍执意推进核污水排海工程建设，这是极不负责任的行为。

　　太平洋不是日本的下水道，日本必须正视各方合理关切，在与周边国家等相关利益方和国际原子能机构充分协商后，制定合理的核污水处理方案。日本也要着眼长远，若只顾眼前，执意将核污水排放入海，不仅其自身，周边国家乃至全世界都将为之买单，其后果必将会危害数代人。

　　Fukushima water disposal by no means Japan’s own business

　　By John Lee

　　(ECNS) -- Japan has announced it will release treated wastewater from the wrecked Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant into the Pacific Ocean this year.

　　Although Fukushima wastewater disposal affects global marine ecological environment protection and public health, Japan has turned a deaf ear to domestic and international opposition to dumping the contaminated water into the sea, treating the "global" matter as its own business.

　　The Fukushima accident in 2011 had sent large quantities of radiation into the atmosphere and the Pacific Ocean, causing irreversible damage to the surrounding environment, and hundreds of thousands of people were forced to evacuate the area. South Korea still maintains its import ban on Japanese seafood from areas affected by the Fukushima nuclear disaster.

　　On April 13, 2021, Japan announced it had decided to discharge contaminated radioactive wastewater in Fukushima Prefecture into the sea due to dwindling storage space, with the Japanese government and plant operator Tokyo Electric Power Company Holdings Inc. promoting the release plan over the past year.

　　The Japanese government argues that the water treated by an advanced liquid processing system, or ALPS, is safe and drinkable, which is undoubtedly fooling the public.

　　In fact, the treated wastewater still includes a variety of radioactive substances and can’t be recycled once discharged into the sea, which will pose a great threat to marine ecology and ultimately endanger human health in the long run.

　　Therefore, the discharge plan has been strongly opposed in Japan. According to a questionnaire conducted by The Asahi Shimbun, nearly 60 percent of mayors of 42 municipalities in Iwate, Miyagi and Fukushima prefectures oppose the discharge plan. The National Fisheries Cooperative Federation of Japan has also repeatedly stated its opposition in public.

　　The Japanese government believes that dumping Fukushima wastewater into the sea is the cheapest and most convenient solution, but neighboring countries and even the whole world will be at risk of nuclear pollution.

　　The Pacific Ocean doesn’t belong to Japan and the wastewater flow along oceanic currents will surely break boundaries and endanger public welfare and the interests of neighboring countries and even the international community.

　　The Korea Economic Daily reported that related research concluded that if contaminated water from Fukushima is released into the ocean, it would only take seven months for the contaminated water to reach the shores of Jeju Island, with the country's aquaculture and tourism suffering considerable losses.

　　According to the calculation of a German marine scientific research institute, radioactive materials will spread to most of the Pacific Ocean within half a year from the date of discharge, and the U.S. and Canada will be affected by nuclear pollution. People in the Pacific region also oppose the discharge plan.

　　As a participant of the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, Japan has the obligation of protecting the marine environment.

　　However, it hasn’t offered a full and convincing explanation on issues like the legitimacy of the discharge plan, the reliability of data on the nuclear-contaminated water, the efficacy of the treatment system or the uncertainty of environmental impact.

　　Though the IAEA has yet to complete a comprehensive review after three investigations in Japan, the Japanese side has been pushing through the approval process for its discharge plan and even started building facilities for the discharge. It is rather irresponsible for Japan to act against public opinion at home and concerns abroad.

　　The Pacific Ocean is not a private Japanese sewer. The country must seriously heed the voices of the international community and make a reasonable plan for the Fukushima wastewater disposal after full consultation with stakeholders and international agencies.

　　If it only seeks instant interest and insists on discharging the contaminated water into the sea, not only itself, but also its neighboring countries and the entire world will pay for the decision and several generations will be forced to bear the consequence.